![A Better Method of Type Checking JavaScript Objects: Object.getPrototypeOf() | by Dr. Derek Austin 🥳 | The Startup | Medium A Better Method of Type Checking JavaScript Objects: Object.getPrototypeOf() | by Dr. Derek Austin 🥳 | The Startup | Medium](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:1400/1*Jj-ZFthcwYIWY62Ed03HEA.png)
A Better Method of Type Checking JavaScript Objects: Object.getPrototypeOf() | by Dr. Derek Austin 🥳 | The Startup | Medium
![Not compatible with Luxon fromJSDate within Angular/Jest test? · Issue #48 · Jimbly/timezone-mock · GitHub Not compatible with Luxon fromJSDate within Angular/Jest test? · Issue #48 · Jimbly/timezone-mock · GitHub](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/25107583/127914812-904628ab-ca2e-4aa1-8fb0-08bf5ca301f4.png)
Not compatible with Luxon fromJSDate within Angular/Jest test? · Issue #48 · Jimbly/timezone-mock · GitHub
Object.prototype.toString.call(form) returns "[object Object]" instead of "[ object FormData]" · Issue #396 · form-data/form-data · GitHub
![javascript - Why is Array.prototype designed to be a fully functional array? - Software Engineering Stack Exchange javascript - Why is Array.prototype designed to be a fully functional array? - Software Engineering Stack Exchange](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wBZPM.png)
javascript - Why is Array.prototype designed to be a fully functional array? - Software Engineering Stack Exchange
![Object.prototype.toString.call(),instanceof,typeof,Array.isArray()_typeof instanceof object.prototype.tostring().call-CSDN博客 Object.prototype.toString.call(),instanceof,typeof,Array.isArray()_typeof instanceof object.prototype.tostring().call-CSDN博客](https://img-blog.csdnimg.cn/20190313175638939.png?x-oss-process=image/watermark,type_ZmFuZ3poZW5naGVpdGk,shadow_10,text_aHR0cHM6Ly9ibG9nLmNzZG4ubmV0L0xpdHRsZV9QaWdfQnVn,size_16,color_FFFFFF,t_70)